Swiney v. Malone Freight Lines
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
This appeal presents two principal questions, the first of which, insofar as we have been able to determine, is one of first impression in this state: (1) Does the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur apply where a wheel becomes detached from a moving vehicle, and (2) if so, did the Defendants introduce sufficient proof to entitle them to a directed verdict at the conclusion of all the proof?
The facts are relatively simple and undisputed. Plaintiffs’ proof showed that on December 21, 1973, about 1:30 p. m., Davis M. Swiney, Plaintiff-Appéllee, was driving his 1967 Chevrolet automobile in a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sullivan v. CrabtreeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
- Roberts v. RayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958
- Boykin v. Chase Bottling WorksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
- Covey v. Western Tank Lines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
- Smith v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- German v. NichopoulosCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
- Berryman v. K Mart Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Rutherford v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Konicki v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
- Swiney v. Malone Freight LinesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1976