Curl v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} Two questions of law are presented to this court for resolution on this appeal: one, does Ohio law require privity of contract between parties in order to recover on a claim for breach of an implied warranty pursuant to the federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty-Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act, Section 2301 et seq., Title 15, U.S.Code; and two, as a matter of law, what constitutes a new motor vehicle, as that term is used in R.C. 1345.71 et seq., Ohio’s Nonconforming New Motor Vehicle Law, also known as the Lemon Law.
{¶ 2} In the matter before us, Volkswagen of America, Inc., an…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Dippel v. ScianoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Lonzrick v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- McKinney v. Bayer Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- Matanky v. Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- In re FCA US LLC Monostable Elec. Gearshift Litig.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- Traxler v. PPG Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.