Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Yastrop

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 2001No. 0259 M.D. Appeal Docket 1999PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*340OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

NEWMAN, Justice.

We granted allowance of appeal in this case to address whether a systematic roadblock set up to detect drunken drivers is constitutional under Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.1 Because this Court has held previously that roadblocks like the one conducted in the present case are permissible under the Pennsylvania Constitution, we hold that a systematic roadblock established to identify drunken drivers, which adheres to certain guidelines, is constitutional.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Police Officer Robert Hawke…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. State v. DowneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. State v. GerschofferIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. GaribaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. BeamanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Hunter v. PopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API