Legal Opinion

Barber v. Addis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 25, 1966No. 41977PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Erankum, Judge.

1. In a suit for malicious prosecution the gravamen of the action is the want of probable cause on the part of the person instituting the prosecution. Tanner-Brice *807Co. v. Barrs, 55 Ga. App. 453, 454 (5) (190 SE 676). And whether the plaintiff was guilty or innocent of the charge for which he was prosecuted is not material. Tanner-Brice Co. v. Barrs, supra, division 2. “The burden of proving the want of probable cause is on the plaintiff” (Auld v. Colonial Stores, 76 Ga. App. 329, 335 (45 SE2d 827)), and he does not in any reasonable sense carry this burden unless he shows by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hicks v. BrantleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Auld v. Colonial Stores Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  3. Tanner-Brice Co. v. BarrsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Woodruff v. DossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BonnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Sanfrantello v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. West v. BaumgartnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  4. Turner v. BogleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  5. Morgan v. MizeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API