Legal Opinion
Board of Com'rs of Grady Co. v. Hammerly
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 18, 1921No. 11736PublishedCited by 25 opinions
Error from District Court, Grady County; Will Lynn, Judge. Action by Harry Hammerly against the Board of Commissioners of Grady County, the City of Chiekasha, and unknown holders of improvement bonds, including A. V. Foster, to liquidate delinquent taxes on real estate. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtKennamer, J.
This case presents error from the district court of Grady county. For convenience, the parties will be designated herein as they appeared iu the trial court. The questions involved necessitate setting forth plaintiff’s petition and statute involved in toto.
Plaintiff, by his petition, alleges:
“That he is a resident -of 'Grady county, Oklahoma, and is the own-er of and in possession of all the lots numbered eleven and twelve, in block number fifty-one, in the city of Chiekasha, in Grady county, Oklahoma.
“That heretofore on the 9th -day of May, 1910, th-e defendant, the city of Chiekasha, herein…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Parks v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Denney v. State ex rel. BaslerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Page v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- State ex rel. Murphy v. BarnesSupreme Court of Florida · 1888
- State v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Sheldon v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Nelson v. PittsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Fitzsimmons v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.