New Hampshire Insurance v. Varda, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered July 23,1998, which denied plaintiffs motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum served upon a nonparty, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs motion to quash was properly denied, since the information sought by defendants’ subpoena duces tecum was not “ ‘utterly irrelevant to any proper inquiry* ” (Ayubo v Eastman Kodak Co., 158 AD2d 641, 642; Pagan v City of New York, 180 AD2d 545). We have considered plaintiffs additional arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J. P., Wallach, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ayubo v. Eastman Kodak Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Pagan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- Velez v. Hunts Point Multi-Service Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Dominicci v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- DOMINICCI, LIMARIE v. FORD, THOMASAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Dominicci v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re the Estate of LiGreciNew York Surrogate's Court · 2016