Auto Channel, Inc. v. Speedvision Network, LLC
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HEYBURN, District Judge.
In a separate Memorandum Opinion the Court has discussed numerous dispositive motions. As a result, Plaintiffs have the following causes of action remaining: (1) unfair competition and misappropriation of trade secrets against Cox, Comcast, Continental and Speedvision and (2) various contractual, bad faith, fraud and fiduciary duty common law actions against Cox.
The Court now considers motions of Defendant Speedvision Network, LLC (“Speedvision”) and Defendant Continental Cablevision, Inc. (“Continental”) to dismiss Plaintiffs’ remaining claims…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hinners v. RobeyKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- Asevedo v. NBCUniversal Media, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
- Booth v. Verity, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2000
- Spectrum Scan, LLC v. AGM CALIFORNIADistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2007
- Johnson v. Diamond Shine, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.