Legal Opinion

People v. Faulkner

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 1, 1980No. 78-286PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Downing

Defendants, Clarence Faulkner and Richard Ford, were charged by indictment with rape, robbery, and aggravated kidnapping. After a bench trial, defendants were found guilty of rape and aggravated kidnapping. Both received sentences of 12 to 18 years. On appeal this court is asked to consider (1) whether the trial court erred when it denied Faulkner’s motion to suppress identification testimony; (2) whether the trial court erred when it permitted admission of an exhibit absent necessary foundation testimony; (3) whether defendants’ court-appointed attorneys failed to provide effective…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. BoswellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. Auclair v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. People v. JumperAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. People v. DoveAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API