Auclair v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RAPER, Justice.
Paul Auclair (appellant) was found guilty by a jury and sentenced on three criminal counts1 arising from an incestuous relationship he engaged in with his thirteen year-old daughter. During the trial the transcript of a recorded telephone conversation between appellant and his daughter, held before appellant was arrested, was introduced and received into evidence by the trial judge over his objection. Appellant raises on appeal the following issue:
“Was the appellant[’]s Sixth Amendment right to counsel denied by the use and introduction into evidence at trial, of the transcript…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Griego v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Asch v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Ochoa v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Giles v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Kimbley v. City of Green RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.