Legal Opinion

Auclair v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1983No. 5775PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Justice.

Paul Auclair (appellant) was found guilty by a jury and sentenced on three criminal counts1 arising from an incestuous relationship he engaged in with his thirteen year-old daughter. During the trial the transcript of a recorded telephone conversation between appellant and his daughter, held before appellant was arrested, was introduced and received into evidence by the trial judge over his objection. Appellant raises on appeal the following issue:

“Was the appellant[’]s Sixth Amendment right to counsel denied by the use and introduction into evidence at trial, of the transcript…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Griego v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Asch v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Ochoa v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Giles v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Kimbley v. City of Green RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API