Legal Opinion

Bell v. State Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1845PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.

— The state bank, the indorsee of a promissory-note, brought a joint action of assumpsit against Benbridge the maker, and Bell the indorser thereof. The note, as described in the declaration, bears date November 3d, 1841, at Lafayette, and is for 534 dollars payable and negotiable at the branch bank at Lafayette in thirty days from date. Plea, the general issue by both defendants, and sworn to by Bell. Verdict for the plaintiff; motion for a new trial overruled; and judgment upon the verdict.

It appeared in evidence, that the note described in the declaration was originally a printed form of a…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bank of Columbia Ex Rel. Bank of United States v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1828

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holland v. HatchIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Brannum Lumber Co. v. PickardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Riggs v. HatchU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1883
  4. Sharpe v. DrewIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API