Legal Opinion

Skinner v. Berry Petroleum Company

District Court, D. Utah

Decided March 29, 2023No. 1:19-cv-00124Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION CODY DEE SKINNER, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY v. JUDGMENT AND MOTION FOR A FRCP RULE 16 SCHEDULING BERRY PETROLEUM COMPANY, LLC; CONFERENCE HOLLYFRONTIER REFINING & MARKETING LLC, Case No. 1:19-cv-00124 Defendants. Judge Ted Stewart This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment1 and Plaintiff’s Motion for a FRCP Rule 16 Scheduling Conference.2 For the reasons discussed below, the Court will deny both Motions. I.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API