Legal Opinion
Blackman v. Katz
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 9, 1990No. 00816PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MONTEMURO, Judge:
Appellant, Alexander Katz, C.P.A., appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia. Following a nonjury trial, the trial court found that appellant had engaged in an outrageous and unconscionable course of conduct which constituted unfair competition. The trial court enjoined appellant from soliciting or servicing the accounts of former clients of appellee, Perry N. Blackman, C.P.A., ordered an accounting of funds received from former Black-man accounts, and awarded compensatory and punitive damages, to be assessed at a hearing within ninety (90) days.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Carson v. American Brands, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. BodingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lower Lake Dock Co. v. Messinger Bearing Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Continental Bank v. Andrew Building Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Williams v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- In Re: Twenty-Second Investigating Grand JurySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Weis Markets, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993