Legal Opinion
Frecker v. City of Dayton
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1950No. 31765PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The brief of defendants recites the following history of the case:
“The plaintiff-appellee sought and obtained in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County a finding that ordinance No. 16059 of the city of Dayton, Ohio, is unreasonable; that it has no real or substantial relation to public safety, health or welfare, and therefore that it is null and void and violative of the Constitutions of Ohio and the United States. That court accordingly granted an injunction permanently enjoining the enforcement of the said ordinance.
“The defendants-appellants appealed on questions of…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Village of West Jefferson v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- Trio Distributor Corp. v. City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Greater Fremont, Inc. v. City of FremontDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
- State ex rel. Sunset Estate Properties, L.L.C. v. Village of LodiOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- Deshler v. HoopsHenry County Court of Common Pleas · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.