Harris v. Richardson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Stevens county, Flaherty, J., granting plaintiff an inspection of a document in defendant’s possession, with leave to serve a reply or an amended complaint after such inspection had as plaintiff might be advised.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
This action is brought to recover damages for defendant’s alleged breach of the conditions of a contract to construct a brick office building for plaintiff according to plans and specifications attached thereto. Defendant answered, claiming that he had erected the structure in a proper manner, according to the terms of the contract, and according to plaintiff’s instructions from time to time; also that the building was duly inspected and accepted by plaintiff. Before the necessary reply to the new matter was served, plaintiff, upon affidavits, moved the court for an order upon defendant to…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- In Re Trusteeship Under Will of MelgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Kaiser v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1912
- In Re Trusteeship Under Will of MelgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933