Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Trusteeship Under Will of Melgaard

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 13, 1933No. 29,214Published

1DissentStone, J.

If I were making law I Avould do it precisely as it is done in the majority opinion, which probably reaches the more desirable result. But inasmuch as we must take the statute as we find it, I reach the opposite conclusion.

If the order in question is one granting or denying a provisional remedy, within the meaning of G. S. 1923 (2 Mason, 1927) § 9498(2), it is appealable. Inasmuch as a provisional remedy is one “pro-Arided for present need, or for the occasion * * * one adapted to meet a particular exigency” (6 Wd. & Phr. [1 ser.] 5752) there ought to be no question but that discovery is a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Noonan v. OrtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Pritchard v. LewisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Ellinger v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Phipps v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API