Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Railway Exp. Agency

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 1948No. 4 Div. 68PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Judge.

On May 23, 1946 the plaintiff below delivered to defendant’s (appellee’s) agent at Opp a quantity of bees for shipment to Carrot River, Saskatchewan, Canada. Upon arrival 80% of the bees were dead.

The complaint originally filed contained one count, and tended to follow the ■ Code form, Form 15, Section 223, Title 7 Code of Alabama 1940. This count however claimed damages “for failure to deliver certain goods, towit: One hundred pounds of live bees, received by the defendant, as a common carrier, to be delivered to A. J. Janzen, Carrot River, Sasic, Canada, for reward, which it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. South & North Alabama Railroad v. HenleinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Steele v. TownsendSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
  3. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. J. W. Maddox Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Louisville N. R. Co. v. HendricksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Atlantic Coast Line R. v. J. S. Carroll Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1953
  2. Railway Exp. Agency v. AndersonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API