Anderson v. Railway Exp. Agency
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Judge.
On May 23, 1946 the plaintiff below delivered to defendant’s (appellee’s) agent at Opp a quantity of bees for shipment to Carrot River, Saskatchewan, Canada. Upon arrival 80% of the bees were dead.
The complaint originally filed contained one count, and tended to follow the ■ Code form, Form 15, Section 223, Title 7 Code of Alabama 1940. This count however claimed damages “for failure to deliver certain goods, towit: One hundred pounds of live bees, received by the defendant, as a common carrier, to be delivered to A. J. Janzen, Carrot River, Sasic, Canada, for reward, which it…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- South & North Alabama Railroad v. HenleinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Steele v. TownsendSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. J. W. Maddox Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. HendricksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Atlantic Coast Line R. v. J. S. Carroll Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
3Cited by2 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1953
- Railway Exp. Agency v. AndersonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950