Legal Opinion

Jones v. Helena Truck Lines, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUGHTREY, Justice.

This workers’ compensation appeal requires us to review the sufficiency of the employee’s notice that he was injured on the job. The trial court dismissed the action, ruling that the employee knew that he had sustained a work-related injury but failed fully to communicate this knowledge to his employer. For reasons set forth below, we disagree with the trial court’s conclusion and find that the employee is entitled to recovery. Because the trial court made no findings beyond the ruling on notice, it is necessary to remand the case for a determination of the award to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Masters v. Industrial Garments Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. LongTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Aluminum Co. of America v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Gluck Brothers, Inc. v. PollardTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Brookside Mills & American Mutual Liability Ins. v. HarrisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Braden v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Kenneth R. Lewis v. Robert Waller, WardenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
  3. Stewart, Glenn v. Cost Plus/World MarketTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2016
  4. Thomas, Horace Wade v. ZIpp ExpressTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API