Legal Opinion

Gluck Brothers, Inc. v. Pollard

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1968PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cbesok

This is an appeal by the employer in a workmen’s compensation proceeding, from an adverse judgment rendered in the Circuit Court of Hamblen County, Tennessee. This appeal involves three aspects of the Workmen’s Compensation Act: (1) Causal connection between the employment and the ultimate condition of petitioner, T.C.A. sec. 50-902(d); (2) Statute of limitations, T.C.A. sec. 50-1003; and (3) Notice, T.C.A. sec. 50-1001.

The parties will be referred to herein as they appeared in the lower court; that is, plaintiff in error Gluck Brothers, Inc. as defendant, and defendant' in error Emory H.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown Shoe Company v. ReedTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Kingsport Silk Mills v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Ward v. North American Rayon CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Imperial Shirt Corporation v. JenkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Marshall Construction Co. v. RussellTennessee Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McCaleb v. Saturn Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Hill v. Eagle Bend Manufacturing, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Jose v. Equifax, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. W. R. Grasle Co. v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bray v. Consolidated Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API