Legal Opinion

State v. Franklin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 2013No. 36A13PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of Cary, 365 N.C. 305, 716 S.E.2d 849 (2011); Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 S.E.2d 223 (2010).

AFFIRMED.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of CarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  2. Amward Homes, Inc. v. Town of CarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Goldston v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  2. State v. KilletteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019