Legal Opinion

Goldston v. State

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 8, 2010No. 443A09PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM. Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON

took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three mem bers voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Formyduval v. Britt, 361 N.C. 215, 639 S.E.2d 443 (2007); Pitts v. Am. Sec. Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 292, 569 S.E.2d 647 (2002).

AFFIRMED.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pitts v. American Security InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Formyduval v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. CravenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
  2. State v. PastuerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  3. Baysden v. State, 366 NC 370Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
  4. State v. PendergraftSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  5. Stark v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API