Legal Opinion
Beneville v. York
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided July 10, 2000No. Civil Action 17638PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINE, Vice Chancellor.
Plaintiff Edward S. Beneville, Jr. has filed this derivative action, in which he alleges that two of the then-directors of CARNET Holding Corporation, defendants Michael York and Eli Dabich, Jr., breached their fiduciary duties as directors of CARNET. York and Dabich, the complaint asserts, caused CARNET to enter into a technology licensing and marketing agreement (the “Marketing Agreement”) with a subsidiary of another corporation, SYNERGY 2000, Inc. (“SYNERGY”), that they controlled as officers and through their ownership of 57% of that company’s shares. York…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- Grobow v. PerotSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Beam Ex Rel. M. Stewart Living v. StewartSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Teamsters Union 25 Health Services & Insurance Plan v. Gavin BaieraCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
- Carsanaro v. Bloodhound Technologies, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- In Re ORACLE CORP DERIVATIVE LITIGATIONCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
- In Re Amerco Derivative LitigationNevada Supreme Court · 2011
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.