Legal Opinion

Long v. The Seatrain New Orleans

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 23, 1942No. 9975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

It appearing from the libel, that libellant appellant was given the notice required by, was discharged in accordance with, and was paid the wages due him under, the shipping articles, the district judge, in response to an exception that no cause of action for additional wages and penalties was shown, dismissed the libel.

The shipping articles constituted the contract of employment, Peninsular & Occidental S. S. Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 98 F.2d 411, they were reasonable and not in violation of any provision of law, and ship and crew were bound by them.

The decree was right.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peninsular & Occidental S. S. Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aird v. Weyerhaeuser S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Jon C. Bunn v. Global Marine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. Mason v. Texas Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948
  4. Aird v. Weyerhaeuser S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  5. In re KarlssonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API