In re Weissbord
District Court, D. New Jersey
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of Morris Weissbord, an alleged bankrupt. On exceptions to the report of the special master, to whom was referred the fixing "and allowance of the costs, counsel fees, expenses, and damages occasioned through the seizure of the alleged bankrupt’s property by a receiver.
1Opinion of the Court
HAIGHT, District Judge.
The questions to be decided in this case will appear as they are discussed. Upon the filing of an involuntary petition against the alleged bankrupt (hereinafter referred to as the “respondent”), an application was made by all of the petitioning creditors for the appointment of a receiver, pursuant to section 2, cl. 3, of the Bankruptcy Act. A receiver was accordingly appointed and a bond filed, as required by section 3e. Thereafter, upon the application of the respondent, the amount of the bond, so required to be given, was increased. An additional bond was then filed,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Citizens' Bank v. CannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Bither v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1907
- In re LacovCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
- In re WilliamsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1903
- In re Charles W. Aschenbach Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Hurlburt Motors, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1920
- Van Duser v. American Surety Co.Rochester City Court · 1934
- In re KaplanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1938