Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 2, 1942No. 43452PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhaley, Chief Justice

The plaintiffs, as receivers of the Norfolk Southern Railroad Company, bring this suit to recover the costs of tearing down the old bridge and erecting a new bridge over the Albemarle & Chesapeake Canal, an artificial, navigable waterway connecting the southern branch of the Elizabeth River with headwaters of the North Landing River, and with Currituck Sound, in the State of Virginia.

The Norfolk Southern Railroad at all times hereinafter mentioned was the owner of the right-of-way of 75 feet in *367width over which the canal passed and had constructed a bridge and fender system across the waters…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. United States v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. President of the Monongahela Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Cope v. CopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Byrd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  2. United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API