Legal Opinion
Bingham v. Newtown Bank
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 8, 1918No. 9,452Published
From Fountain Circuit Court; Isaac E. Schoonover, Judge. Action by James Bingbam, receiver of tbe Columbia Casualty Company, against tbe Newtown Bank, in wbicb one Rudolph C. Keller intervened. From a judgment for the intervener, Keller appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtIbach, C. J.
Appellant brought this action against
the Newtown Bank to recover upon a certificate of deposit as follows:
‘ ‘ Certificate of Deposit.
“Newtown Bank $245.00 “Newtown, Indiana, October 2,1912.
“This certifies that Columbia Casualty Company has deposited in this bank two hundred and forty-five and no/100 dollars, payable to the order of self, due August 5, 1913, on the return of this certificate properly endorsed.
“T. C. Shultz, Cashier.”
Rudolph C. Keller was admitted as a party defendant upon his intervening petition, and he filed a cross-complaint claiming to be the owner of the certificate.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kirkwood v. First National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Henry Miller, in Error v. David Austen, William S. Wilmerding, and David Austen, Jr.Supreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Hunt v. DivineIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
- Cassidy v. First National Bank of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- Hatch v. First National BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.