Legal Opinion

Government of Guam v. Cruz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 14, 1989No. 88-2905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:

We are presented with a land dispute claim that turns on the interpretation of Guam Civ.Code § 1157.93 (1970). We must determine whether that statute allows parties to relitigate a property boundary dispute when a mistake may have occurred in prior litigation between the same parties. The district court held that section 1157.93 allowed relitigation in this case. We disagree and reverse.

FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

The Government of Guam (“Guam”) and Ramon and Eliza Cruz (“Cruz”) own adjoining properties. Their respective certificates of title indicate overlapping…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Robi v. Five Platters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. The People of the Territory of Guam v. Jae Hung YangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Cooper v. BuxtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Frances Investment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adrian L. Cristobal v. Jeffrey SiegelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Roche Palo Alto LLC v. Apotex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2007
  3. Govt. of Guam and Guam Waterworks Authority v. Core Tech International Corp.Superior Court of Guam · 2022
  4. In re Land Registration for Lot No. 361, Inarajan, GuamSuperior Court of Guam · 2012
  5. No. 88-2905Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API