Legal Opinion
State v. Gilbert
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided October 16, 2009No. 08-CA-82PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Fain, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Larry Calvin Gilbert, appeals from his conviction and sentence on one count of possession of cocaine in violation of R.C. 2925.11(A). After pleading no contest to the charge, Gilbert was sentenced to eight months in prison.
{¶ 2} Gilbert contends that the trial court committed reversible error in denying his motion to suppress the drug evidence and statements obtained as the result of his illegal detention and search.
{¶ 3} We conclude that the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress. Under Arizona v. Gant (2009), 556 U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1710,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GrubbOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- State v. CaulfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. GaddisOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. AndersonClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 2010
- State v. GrubbOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.