Legal Opinion

Thomas H. Quinn, Inc. v. Realty Investment Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 10, 1971No. 393PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Maryland Rule 828 b 1 a requires that the printed extract shall include “the judgment appealed from together with the opinion or charge of the lower court, if any.” *309In this case, in which the appellant seeks to strike down Rule 542 of the Sixth Circuit which provides that the right of removal is waived unless a written suggestion of removal is filed within 45 days after the cause is at issue, the parties agreed upon a statement of undisputed facts under Rule 828 g but neither brief nor extract contains the judgment appealed from. We deem it appropriate to dismiss the appeal under Rule 828 i;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roy v. HydeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shreffler v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API