Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. Rauch

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1901No. 3517PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Garfield County. — Hon. Melvm M. Godman, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Reavis, C. J.

Suit to recover upon unpaid subscription to the capital stock of a corporation. Plaintiff recovered judgment against the corporation defendant, C. A. Lundy & Co., in an action at law, execution was issued thereon, the property of the corporation exhausted, and the execution returned, with the sum of $2,126.12 unsatisfied. Thereupon plaintiff commenced the present action to recover from the defendants E. M. Rauch and C. A. Lundy the remainder of the judgment. Rauch and Lundy, when the corporation was formed, subscribed for the entire…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adamant Manufacturing Co. of America v. WallaceWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Watterson v. MastersonWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Brundage v. Monumental Gold & Silver Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Shuey v. AdairWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Hurlbutt v. N. W. Spaulding Saw Co.California Supreme Court · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Spokane Valley Land & Water Co. v. Arthur D. Jones & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Davies v. BallWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Lantz v. MoellerWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Johns v. ClothesWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Barnard Manufacturing Co. v. Ralston Milling Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API