Friedman v. Local 144 Nursing Home Pension Fund (In re Greenwald)
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER
HOWARD SCHWARTZBERG, Bankruptcy Judge.
Facts
The defendants in this adversary proceeding have moved this court for an order, pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 7015(a) of the Bankruptcy Rules, granting leave to amend their answer to add three additional affirmative defenses.
*29This adversary proceeding was commenced by the plaintiff in February, 1986. The plaintiff, Jack Friedman, alleges that he is entitled to subrogation as to the defendants’ claims in this bankruptcy proceeding based on a payment, in the amount of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lerman v. Chuckleberry Publishing, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Boyle v. Texasgulf Aviation, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Nyscoseal, Inc. v. Parke, Davis & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Fustok v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Yoder v. T.E.L. Leasing, Inc. (In Re Suburban Motor Freight, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990