Legal Opinion

Brigham City v. Rich

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1908No. 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Box Elder County; W. W* Maughan, Judge. P'roceeding by Brigham City against J. T. Rich and others to condemn land for public use. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant tbe Box Elder Power & Light Company appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtErick, J.

On the 30th day of October, 1902, Brigham City, the plaintiff herein, a municipal corporation, commenced this proceeding in the district court of Box Elder county, TJtah, against the Brigham City Electric Light Company, a corporation, J. T. Rich, and Charles Knudsen to condemn a certain parcel of land, together with a right of way for a pipe line to be used for the purpose of constructing and maintaining thereon an electric light plant by said Brigham City, with a view of producing and furnishing lights for its own use and for the use of the inhabitants of said city. The complaint contains…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shepley v. CowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. Price CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Wright v. RoseberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Langdeau v. HanesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Deseret Salt Co. v. TarpeySupreme Court of the United States · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sweet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  2. Jelco, Incorporated v. Third Judicial District CourtUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Makemson v. DillonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  4. McKinney v. CarsonUtah Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API