State of California v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
Despite petitioner’s assertion that Aid Retarded Children, Ine. merely simulated an employment relationship with the present participant in its program to train him to act as a future employee, there were enough elements of the real relation here to sustain the Industrial Accident Commission’s finding that such employment existed. Nor does Labor Code section 3352, subdivision (c), preclude applicant’s recovery on the ground that he performed services in return for aid from a charitable organization ■ applicant occupied the status of an employee rather than that of a mere donee of charity.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Empire Star Mines Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- S. A. Gerrard Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Riskin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Smith v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- McBurney v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- American Mutual Insurance Company of Boston and Rose Brothers Company v. Willie B. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- People v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Van Horn v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- National Automobile & Casualty Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.