Legal Opinion

Neff v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 2010No. 29A02-0904-CR-332PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

BARNES, Judge.

Dustin Neff petitions for rehearing following our decision in Neff v. State, 915 N.E.2d 1026 (Ind.Ct.App.2009). There, we held that, although the State failed to prove venue in Hamilton County for a charge of child solicitation, double jeopardy principles did not prohibit a retrial on that charge in Madison County. Id. at 1036-37. Neff challenges our double jeopardy conclusion. We issue this opinion on rehearing but affirm our original decision in all respects.

Neff observes that Indiana Code Section 35-32-2-5(a) states:

When it appears, at any time before…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Neff v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Strickland v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Elkins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Sowers v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shawn Blount v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Christopher Milo v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Joshua R. Walker v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Mark A. Kimmel v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Tavis Ray Crittendon v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API