Stuart Robbennolt v. Heidi Washington
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COOK, Circuit Judge.
Because this court’s decision in Abbott v. Michigan, 474 F.3d 324 (6th Cir.2007), resolves the precise question this case poses, we follow Abbott and reverse.
A Michigan court ordered Stuart Rob-bennolt to direct General Motors to forward his pension benefits to his current residence — a Michigan state prison — to be used to defray the costs of his incarceration. Robbennolt accordingly notified GM, and Michigan seized 90% of the forthcoming benefits. Several years later, Robben-nolt sued the warden in federal district court, seeking return of the seized benefits. As was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Skinner v. SwitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Lance v. DennisSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Louis David Johnson, Jr. v. Unknown Dellatifa (03-1497/1880) Unknown Carline (03-1506/1865) S. Powers (03-1555/1833) Dave Stasewish (03-1559/1835)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. EnglerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fields v. CottrillDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
- LJ Consulting Services, LLC v. SunTrust Investment Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020