Legal Opinion

Korff v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1991No. 17S03-9103-CR-219PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

KRAHULIK, Justice.

The State asks us to accept transfer of this case to resolve a conflict between the memorandum decision of the Court of Appeals and the cases of Haskett v. State (1979), 179 Ind.App. 655, 386 N.E.2d 1012, and Abdul-Musawwir v. State (1985), Ind.App., 483 N.E.2d 464, and to answer the question presented to the Court of Appeals in the interlocutory appeal, namely, whether it is a violation of the attorney-client privilege for an attorney to testify that he told his client of the time, date, and place of the client's trial. We accept transfer, resolve the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles P. BourassaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. Linda Jean Freeman, AKA Laurie DiecidueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. State v. FingersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. State v. OgleOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Watkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Austin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. State v. ReganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. State v. DavisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. State v. HawesNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Austin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API