Legal Opinion
Saul Ritzenberg v. Noland Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 27, 1966No. 19858PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McGOWAN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal turns upon the proper construction of certain provisions of the District of Columbia laws relating to mechanic’s liens. There is no real dispute about the facts, but only about how the statutes are to be read in relation to them. The District Court granted the lienor’s motion for summary judgment enforcing the lien. We affirm.
I
Appellants are members of a partnership which was formed for the purpose of building an apartment house. The plumbing, heating and electrical work was to be performed by a contractor under an agreement fixing $99,125 as the total…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bounds v. NuttleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Stone v. MoomjianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
- Beeson Hardware Co. v. BurtnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Harper v. Galliher & Huguely, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
- Herrell v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1895
3Cited by2 opinions
- Electrical Equipment Company v. Security National Bank, John W. Underwood and John P. CooneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Fahringer Corp. v. Newman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1976