Legal Opinion

Bounds v. Nuttle

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 11, 1943No. [No. 3, January Term, 1943.]PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, J.

This bill of complaint was filed by the appellees to enforce a mechanic’s lien for materials furnished by them in the construction of a house, of which the appellants are the owners. Not only, the appellees, but the contractors, were made defendants. The contractors had also filed a mechanic’s lien against the same property for an amount in excess of the lien filed by the appellees, but including the materials mentioned in appellees’ lien. The contractors answered, were represented by counsel for the hearing, and one of them testified for the appellees. They did not, however, attempt to prove…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Day v. DayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1865
  2. Albert v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  3. Hensel v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  4. Rody v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  5. Riley v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Barry Properties v. Fick Bros. Roofing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. Welch v. HumphreyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  3. T. Dan Kolker, Inc. v. ShureCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  4. J. F. Johnson Lumber Co. v. MagruderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Crane Co. v. OnleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API