Legal Opinion
Does I Through III v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 18, 2003No. Civ.A. No. 01-02398 (HHK)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KENNEDY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Jane Doe I, Jane Doe II, and Jane Doe III,1 are individuals with developmental disabilities who receive habilitation services from the District of Columbia. Plaintiffs, by their next friends, bring this action on their own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated, against the District of Columbia (“District”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking declaratory, injunc-tive, and monetary relief.2
This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs’ motion for class certification pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(2). Upon…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Qualls v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Does I through III v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Does v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Gatore v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- O.K. v. BushDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.