Legal Opinion
Garey v. Perez F. Huff Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 6, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.
The decision of this motion depends upon the meaning of section 66 of the Insurance Law (as added by Laws of 1913, chap. 52). Plaintiff purchased of defendant in May, 1928, shares of stock of the Piedmont Fire Insurance Company, a foreign insurance company not authorized to do business within the, State of New York. The second, third and fourth causes of action in the complaint assert that the sale was made by defendant, a dealer in securities, in violation of section 66 of the Insurance Law and that plaintiff has tendered the certificates to defendant and demanded the return of the purchase…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Baxter v. . McDonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Duval v. . WellmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Pierce v. BristolNew York Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by4 opinions
- Unger v. Travel Arrangements, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Atkin v. Hill, Darlington & GrimmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Doherty v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
- Gargano v. SmithCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978