Legal Opinion

McFee v. Harker

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1952PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The following three questions are before us on this appeal:(1) Was the negligence of Kleist in parking the tractor-trailer on the highway such an intervening act so as to supersede Harker’s negligence in causing the first collision and render the same not a proximate cause of the second collision ?(2) Was the causal negligence of the plaintiff at least as great, or greater, as a matter of law, than the causal negligence of Harker?(3) Was the causal negligence of Kleist in parking the tractor-trailer on the highway at least as great, or greater, as a matter of law, than the causal negligence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Quady v. SicklWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Schultz v. BroganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Hephner v. WolfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Walton v. BlauertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Kitter v. LenardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stewart v. WulfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Johnson v. HeintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Olson v. RatzelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
  4. Strahlendorf v. Walgreen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Ryan v. CameronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API