McFee v. Harker
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.
The following three questions are before us on this appeal:(1) Was the negligence of Kleist in parking the tractor-trailer on the highway such an intervening act so as to supersede Harker’s negligence in causing the first collision and render the same not a proximate cause of the second collision ?(2) Was the causal negligence of the plaintiff at least as great, or greater, as a matter of law, than the causal negligence of Harker?(3) Was the causal negligence of Kleist in parking the tractor-trailer on the highway at least as great, or greater, as a matter of law, than the causal negligence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Quady v. SicklWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Schultz v. BroganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
- Hephner v. WolfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Walton v. BlauertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
- Kitter v. LenardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stewart v. WulfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Johnson v. HeintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Olson v. RatzelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979
- Strahlendorf v. Walgreen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Ryan v. CameronWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.