Legal Opinion

Mathieu v. Dupnik

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 29, 1981No. 2 CA-CIV 3879PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

Is a person a fugitive within the meaning of our Extradition Act, A.R.S. Sec. 13-3841 et seq., if he has violated his probation in the demanding state? We hold that he is and affirm.

This is an appeal from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus. The extradition papers from Texas allege, inter alia, that appellant had been convicted in Texas of burglary that his sentence was suspended, that he was placed on probation and that he had violated the conditions of his probation by failing to report to his probation officer and by failing to remain in Dallas County. Appellant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gottfried v. CroninSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. State v. TrumanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Richardson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State ex rel. Babbitt v. KinmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. McDonaldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People ex rel. Schank v. GeraceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. State v. McDonaldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API