Legal Opinion

District of Columbia v. Willard Associates

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1995No. 93-TX-1123PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Associate Judge:

For the tax year 1990, appellee Willard Associates (“Willard”) failed to submit in timely fashion information required annually by the Mayor of the District of Columbia to assist in the apportionment of “mixed use” property for purposes of real property taxation. A regulation adopted by the Mayor through the Department of Finance and Revenue (the “Department”) provided that in the event this information was not submitted in time, “the Director [of the Department] shall classify the affected taxpayer’s real property as Class Four Property for the next taxable year.” 9…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Commissioner v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Beard v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. District of Columbia v. Casino Associates, Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Dorchester House Associates Ltd. Partnership v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Beatley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Beatley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API