Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Molter

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 24, 1932No. 569PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

Mrs. Molter claimed a credit for depletion of oil reserves in her income tax returns for 1922 and 1923, under section 214 (a) (10) of the Revenue Act of 1921 (42 Stat. 227, 239). The Commissioner disallowed the credit on *499the ground that she owned no interest in the oil depleted. The Board of Taz Appeals upheld ÍL«. Molter’s contention and the Commissioner appeals.

Depletion allowances are not confined to the owner of the fee; they are to be made to those who have a property right or interest in tho substance depleted. Weiss v. Weiner, 279 U. S. 333, 49 S. Ct. 337, 73…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Poe v. SeabornSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Weiss v. WeinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Lynch v. Alworth-Stephens Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. De Vaughn v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Blythe v. HinckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1901

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  2. Alexander v. Continental Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  3. Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API