Connecticut v. Porter
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBerdon, J.
The court today retains a per se rale that bars from evidence the results of a polygraph test under any circumstances. This per se rale infringes on the defendant’s constitutional right to present a defense. The significance — and indeed the absurdity — of this rale barring polygraph evidence under any circumstances is demonstrated by hypothesizing the following factual scenario. A defendant is accused of a capital felony subject to the death penalty and the only issue is one of identification — that is, whether he was incorrectly identified by a witness as the perpetrator of the crime. The…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.