Legal Opinion

Connecticut v. Porter

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 20, 1997No. SC 15363Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBerdon, J.

The court today retains a per se rale that bars from evidence the results of a polygraph test under any circumstances. This per se rale infringes on the defendant’s constitutional right to present a defense. The significance — and indeed the absurdity — of this rale barring polygraph evidence under any circumstances is demonstrated by hypothesizing the following factual scenario. A defendant is accused of a capital felony subject to the death penalty and the only issue is one of identification — that is, whether he was incorrectly identified by a witness as the perpetrator of the crime. The…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API