Harrell v. Powell
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
We do not consider the clause and sentence stricken from paragraph 8. Plaintiff’s petition, filed under Rule 4(a), 242 N.C. 766, on which certiorari was granted, related only to paragraphs 9-17, both inclusive.
Plaintiff’s only exception and assignment of error is to the entire order of Judge Parker.
The questions presented in plaintiff’s brief relate to whether paragraphs 9-17, both inclusive, considered as a whole, allege facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for fraud. Whether any of the stricken allegations include facts germane to an action to set aside the contract and deed on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Abbitt v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Speight v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Lexington Insulation Company v. Davidson CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Smith v. . BeattySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Craver v. CraverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Harrell v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- McLendon v. Georgia Kaolin Co., Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1992