Legal Opinion

Parish v. Page

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1930No. 5518PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarian, J.

Respondents are husband and wife and at one time owned all of section 36, township 9 south, of range 16, E. B. M., in Twin Falls county, which the evidence shows was a “short” section containing an area of 624.70 acres, 258.66 acres of which lie west of the center line of Rock Creek. Under date of November 20, 1917, they entered into a written agreement with appellant whereby they agreed to sell him “all of the land lying and being west of Rock Creek in Section Thirty-six (36), Township Nine (9) South, Range Sixteen (16) E. B. M., that lies west of the meanders of the creek and is marked by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Willett v. HerrickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  2. Houston v. TrowerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  3. Ellis v. BardinWashington Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Shannon v. PrallWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Ryan v. Old Veteran Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Newlan v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Stewart v. Hood CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Heath v. Utah Home Fire Insurance CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Glickman v. WestonOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Newlan v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API