Legal Opinion

Palenick v. City of Rio Rancho

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 2013No. Docket 33,380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAES, Chief Justice.

This appeal stems from the termination of Rio Rancho’s City Manager, James Palenick (Palenick), and requires us to address the narrow issue of whether Palenick is estopped from pursuing a breach of contract claim against the City of Rio Rancho (the City) based on an alleged violation of the Open Meetings Act (OMA), NMSA 1978, Sections 10-15-1 to -4 (1974, as amended through 2009). We conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the district court’s finding that Palenick waived his right to pursue a breach of contract claim against the City based on an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crutchfield v. New Mexico Department of Taxation & RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Golden Cone Concepts, Inc. v. Villa Linda Mall, Ltd.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Brown v. TaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  4. J.R. Hale Contracting Co. v. United New Mexico BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Chavez v. GomezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. StallingsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Bar J Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Fisher Sand & Gravel Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
  3. Palenick v. City of Rio RanchoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API