Legal Opinion

Harrell v. . Commissioners of Wilson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The questions involved: May the defendant “the board of commissioners for the county of Wilson” (a) Issue bonds to repair the common jail of the county? (b) Issue bonds to repair and make additions to public school buildings in the county ? These questions must be answered in the affirmative.

In regard to the first question. N. C. Code of 1931 (Michie), sec. 1321(a) (Public Laws, 1923, chap.. 143, sec. 1): “The board of commissioners of the various counties throughout the State are authorized and empowered to issue bonds or notes for the purpose of borrowing-money with which to erect, build,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brodnax v. GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  2. Frazier v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Sidney Spitzer & Co. v. Commissioners of Franklin CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Vaughn v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Jackson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Morgan v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Bryant v. Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Castevens v. . Stanly CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Board of Com'rs of Guadalupe County v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Bryant v. Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API