Edwards v. Apple Computer, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Douglas Edwards, a prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of defendant Apple Computer, Inc.’s (“Apple”) motion to dismiss his complaint alleging misappropriation of trade secrets, under the Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“FUTSA”), Fla. Stat. §§ 688.001-.007, and unjust enrichment.
*851I.
On appeal, Edwards argues that the district court erred in holding that his complaint was barred by the statute of limitations because the prisoner mailbox rule did not apply to claims brought under FUTSA and unjust enrichment claims.
We review de novo the district court’s dismissal of a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- John W. Dussouy, Jr. v. Gulf Coast Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Garvey v. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Douglas v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dr. Olaf Cames and Teresa Cames v. Lowe’s Home Centers, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
- Mizell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.(MAG+)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2024