Legal Opinion
Lockridge v. City of Oldsmar, Fla.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided September 27, 2005No. 8:03CV1246T27EAJPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WHITTEMORE, District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT are Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt.69), Plaintiffs Memorandum in Support (Dkt.70), Defendant’s Opposition (Dkt.78), Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt.83), Defendant’s Memorandum in Support (Dkt.84), and Plaintiffs Opposition (Dkt.92). Upon consideration, the Court having conducted a hearing on August 17, 2005, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt.69) is GRANTED, and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt.83) is DENIED.
Factual Background
On May…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Covenant Media of Illinois, L.L.C. v. City of Des PlainesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007